Career first, relationship second?

I agree that you should pursue your career first and only then worry about relationships, am I right?

Because if you're very poor, have no money, maybe not even your own apartment, and generally can't do anything, you probably won't be a very interesting partner, right?

And many young people today are going through a phase that is very unstable and makes relationships very difficult.

Especially when no one is available to visit, for example, because of their living situation. And in general, if you don't have the money to do anything, is there no point?

Moving in together is also risky because you would be trapped, so to speak, because of finances.

So, am I right about this: career first, then love? And once you're firmly established in life, you can think about relationships again, right?

And well, people who don't have a career are just unlucky, but I still think you shouldn't date.

How do you see this?

(1 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
13 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rat2010
4 months ago

I see that your view is wrong at the border to bullshit.

It is simply not a (practical) life experience behind it. People and the world do not work like that.

Rat2010
4 months ago
Reply to  NoLifeNoWife

This is also more difficult with the practical life experience. I’ll take back bullshit and replace the expression by “sick.”

Funship
4 months ago

I see it right,

No.

ShimaG
4 months ago

I don’t think you’re right. And at least with me and my environment it went at the same time.

ShimaG
4 months ago
Reply to  NoLifeNoWife

You have to know what you want. Of course, this does not happen without risk or dependency. But if the partner or the partner is the right one, that’s not that bad.

If you want to make a career, you’ll get older.

XXsadXX
4 months ago

I don’t think so.

cafibone
4 months ago

Stupid stuff