Canon RF objektive die in meine Bereiche passen?
Ich suche nach Möglichkeit günstige aber relativ professionelle objektive, die meine Sammlung ergänzen. Mein Kopf platzt, da ja jeder irgendwie ein anderes Equipment für toll befindet und ich mir einfach unsicher bin, was jetzt letztendlich wirklich passt.
Bereiche, die ich noch abdecken möchte:
– Motorsport | Sport und Freizeitbereich
– Haustiere
– Motorräder und Autos Allgemein
Ich habe mir vor kurzem das Canon RF 50mm 1.8 gekauft, um das grundlegende abzudecken, für Portraits und stehende Fahrzeuge bzw Haustiere. Jetzt überlege ich, was noch passend wäre, für die anderen Bereiche. Möglicherweise auch mit F 2,8, für ein schönes Bokeh.
Schreibt mal, was ihr so verwendet 🙂
(2 votes)
Loading...
Hello
simply go into a specialist business with ocassionware and try out various of the optics recommended for the last few weeks on your own camera. You can also do “objective tests” yourself. Is useful/needs for new optics, there are series scatters and transport damage. (In the case of plastic kitzooms, you can save them that are always decentralized)
A good specialist dealer can show/demonstrate the weak/cracking points of the optics in a few seconds, as long as you can even see on a 3″ TFT.
Regular customers can borrow optics for testing/working, at least the group of people you trust. All others pay insurance costs and rental fees.
Otherwise you try to compile the best possible combination for a little budget and now you buy the RF 50/1.8 and still have the RFS 18-45 IS STM “at the back”. Because of the optics, you don’t need to buy/ rewind DSLM. This is also possible with compact cameras and top class smartphones.
The RF 50/1.8 costs New around 190€ and from 225-250€ there is the EFS 17-55/2.8 IS USM (used condition B with warranty) that would have covered/dissolved much more of your motif configurations. Alternatively, an EFS 15-85 IS USM for 150€ or an EFS 18-135 IS STM for 125€ would be available. A used RFS 18-150 IS STM starts at 400€ and can be “less” than the 18-135 IS STM. Many R buyers with the RFS 18-45 suck the used RFS 18-150 from the market for that reason the prices remain long high.
otherwise radically favorable, covering from 16 to 480mm/small image or from 97° to 4° horizontal;
With optics and the RF 50/1.8, you can cover a wide range of motifs and “deserve” money. Enough to slowly buy up into better material with optics and the camera
Development
Between 22 to 28 you can use the 18-45 for emergency, but the gap is in principle also lockable with a large step and from the EFS 10-22 you can crop at 22mm in the middle on 28mm cutout. Although at 22/4.5 it is quite “soft” but from 22/5.6 the optics is good, at 22/8 almost homogeneous.
I say it again; as long as when buying money for the RFS 18-45 IS STM there are quick escape before the market is smashed and each dealer has dozens of the things and maybe sells 4 a month, Canon is just around 25€ discount when you buy an R case with the optics that hot many will buy the case with optics as an addition and press the brand new 18-45 in than used market just get the € 26
Convenient and professional at the same time. In the middle class, there are currently little at RF, but mainly starters/favourable and professional/economic. If you want something in the middle, you should get an EF to RF adapter, then you will find very good lenses in the middle price segment.
For sport, e.g. the EF 70-300mm IS II USM or the 70-200mm f4L IS II USM. At RF there is only the slightly light-slower 100-400mm IS USM.
Pets and motorcycles should be covered with the 50mm. You can still adapt the high-light EF 17-55mm f/2.8 to cover as well as all standard focal lengths and to the level of an L lens.
Used Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 ISM | MPB
I don’t feel so competent for the RF department, but the colleague Uneternal has written a lot of important things about it before yesterday. It seems to be very worthwhile to create an RF-EF adapter, so the entire EF/EF-S range is open to you. I had the Sigma C f2,8/4 – 17-70 mm on my 600d and was highly satisfied! The Tamron f2,8/90 mm Macro should be a poem!
And in addition to your f1,8/50 mm, there are very bright 24,28 and 35 mm glasses. As a friend of fixed focal lengths, they wouldn’t be missing in my photo bag.
My passion is partly very old, manual fixed focal lengths of Zeiss. Not everyone’s thing, but I have a heathen fun on it
Limited. There are lenses that are not compatible with adapters. Frem manufacturers (Tamron/Sigma) have lists which are not usable or can only be used to a limited extent.
My old Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 is not compatible with AF. I’ve got the Viltrox adapter with my own firmware on it, the AF goes, it’s only pumping at FollowAF, and that’s what it means. SingleShot is not a problem.
For this, it must be said that the RF are smaller/lighter than the EF(-S). And usually the AF is faster. At least my two RF are so to speak directly focussed, and my two adapted are feeling a little slower, and actually go even more to the battery. I’m so sorry.
I quoted the colleague Uneternal who knows better with Canon than I do. It seems to me that the RF palette is not as extensive as you would have liked. But I admit: The autofocus is a special story for almost all adapters (I know from Sony).
When it comes to power consumption from the autofocus: I can sing a very sad song as a Sony user!
I can only recommend you to see how far you come with your lenses (depending on what you have everything). What you lack, you notice all by yourself. No one knows what exactly and in what surroundings you photograph… Therefore, all recommendations are only flat-rate… What you need, you will notice when you are unsatisfied. If you need more tele, or more wide angle, more light intensity, or isn’t that cumbersome because you are always photographing only in very bright, or always fade off to increase the depth of the field…. So gather experience instead of just buying recommendations “blind”…
A mackerel lens 1:2,8/90 mm for beautiful portraits,
Tele 1:4/70 – 200 mm, is perfect for most applications.
Wide angle 14 mm – 28 mm ..
LA
Hi.
the RF 50 mm F1.8 STM is a good lens, especially in the price performance ratio. You should try it a little longer, so you get familiar with it. Especially if the image quality convinces, also with beautiful bokeh.
Conclusion
The Canon RF 50 mm F1.8 STM convinces with a solid performance in all areas. In some aspects, the very inexpensive objective even delivers very good values and does not afford any blatant weaknesses. This actually belongs to every photo bag and should be a mandatory purchase especially for photographers with smaller wallets, because a better price-performance ratio does not provide any other RF objective. Of course, it is not possible to expect a full metal lens with weather protection for just over 200 euros, but the 50’s is properly processed, even has a metal bayonet and a combined functional and focus ring. Only a real AF-MF switch we would have wanted. The image quality convinces with beautiful bokeh, only small optical errors and a very high resolution even at the EOS R5 with (something hidden) very low edge drop.
Short description
https://www.digitalkamera.de/Zubeh%C3%B6r Test/Test Report_Canon_RF_50_mm_F1_8_STM/13031.aspx
I will keep it and continue to work with it, but still seek ideas for the other areas for the future. I always like to plan 🙂