Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
8 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Fuchssprung
3 years ago

In very distant past, our ancestors were the preferred prey of leopards. This only changed after they had learned to defend themselves in a group together and throw them with stones. Stones were our first distance weapon.

This type of defense still works today. However, it makes a difference whether the leopard is covered by a rocket from a large sippe or whether a single fighter burns a stone on the fur.

In addition, if you are all alone, you have to meet the leopard with the stone. It often fails to see it before it is too late.

In an open fight, one has only one chance against a leopard if one is highly trained and does nothing of it when the leopard uses its claws and teeth. Years ago, a big-track American has dared such a fight without weapons and with free upper body against a leopard. He got dressed and just survived. The leopard went well after that. He didn’t wear wounds.

GeistundSeele
3 years ago

(1) He doesn’t want to hurt you

2) You don’t fit his prey scheme and don’t taste it very well.

3) In a fight, an average trained man wouldn’t have a chance. In a highly trained near fighter, I appreciate the chances of 10% if the person does not use any tools or weapons.

flapx
3 years ago

Without a gun? Definitely no!

He’s faster than you, he’s stronger than you and he’s naturally armed.

Buckykater
3 years ago

Not without weapons. It happened in very rare cases that a single leopard became a human eater. You wouldn’t have a chance.

DieAntw0rten
3 years ago

I don’t think 🙂

AnnukaSi
3 years ago

A leopard is very fast… if you’re hungry, you don’t have to worry about dinner.

LastRealMan635
3 years ago

Knives in, guts out.

I don’t think it was a weapon.

Mosaaa983
1 month ago

Your mudda