Can anyone help me with this paradox?
How can entanglement in quantum mechanics be reconciled with special relativity, which states that information cannot travel faster than the speed of light? Is there a solution to this paradox?
It would be nice if someone could help me as I have a physics paper tomorrow.
Hello I'll get straight to the question. In my elevator, there's a mirror on the front wall, and the other walls are also reflective but not mirrors. When I look into the other walls, the mirror reflects, and I see my reflection of my reflection in the real mirror (a really weird way of putting…
What percentage does a physics test count for? My question:
There's a fixed amount of energy and matter that doesn't change. But what about black holes, which absorb all matter? Or does it eventually eject this matter? I've also read that black holes are supposed to eject energy; does the same principle apply?
Hello, can anyone tell me what types of turbines there are for generating energy? I can't find anything concrete on the internet.
For a 10kw 3 phase generator: What happens if I connect a load to only one phase conductor? How many kW will I get out of that? And the most important question: does it damage the generator? What happens if I use 2 outer conductors?
Why no communication with overlight speed is possible with restricted quantum states of removed particles:
Chapter 1 – What is a quantum state? This is not a measured state of a particle, but the superposition of all possible states in which the particle can be measured when measured. Only the probabilities of the different states are known before the measurement. Only through the measurement the particle decides for one of the possibilities, before it does not know what comes out.
Chapter 2 – What is a restriction? A quantum state does not have to be limited to one particle, but can comprise several particles. These particles can also be far from each other, and they are then referred to as interlinked. But it is not several quantum states that are coupled to each other by magic, but it is actually only one.
Chapter 3 – What is the special thing that the Einstein called “spicious remote action”? If the states of two cross-linked particles are finally measured, a state which depends on the measured state of the other occurs in both cases as if the particles had agreed to what state they should decide. This is, by the way, not a hidden parameter that the particles carry with them like note in lucky cookies – the statistics e.g. of the measurements of spins of interlinked particles show that such a parameter does not exist, the decision actually falls only during the measurement.
Chapter 4 – Why can’t you communicate about it? The restriction applies only to the quantum state before the measurement, not to the particles after the measurement. Although the “transmitter”, which wants to write a message to the “receiver”, can influence the quantum state before the measurement, but what he has “written”, he himself knows only after the measurement.
Chapter 4 – Analogy. We don’t take Schrödinger’s cat in the box. We replace the cat with a cube and the box with a cube cup. The cube cup closed with the palm is the quantum state, the probabilities for the 6 cube sides are 1/6. Now we give 2 crossed cube cups Bob and Alice and say you should shake and tilt out (this is the measurement) and – spherical remote effect – both see the same number of eyes. But Bob can’t tell Alice in this way – after falling the cubes the restriction is broken. When Bob turns a cube, Alice’s cube doesn’t turn. Bob can, of course, shake his cup separately beforehand and thus produce a different number of eyes, but he does not know what.
No information will be transmitted in quantum interrelation…
If interlinked quantums are measured, no information is transmitted between them. This will be in a Articles in the blog of the physicist Martin Bäker really well explained.
Thank you.