Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
21 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
apt2nowhere
1 year ago

I am neither vegan nor vegetarian

I never use softeners because it has always been known to me that this industrial waste contains and the sale saves the cost of disposal – so I do not reject it because it contains substances of animal origin

we (= my husband and I) also don’t need a softener – some rough towels are much healthier than soft – rough towels are much more useful when removing dead skin particles – and such skin particles are available every day

HikoKuraiko
1 year ago

No, I don’t use it and I haven’t used it as omni. And that contained in slaughtered waste there, I already knew at omni times.

SpookyBatwing
1 year ago

No, even though there are vegans.
But I don’t need one.

wickedsick05
1 year ago

Also used in plant cultivation:

Bioland allows bone and blood meal as fertilizer

https://www.animal-health-online.de/gross/2000/12/02/bioland-erlaubt-knochen-und-blutmehl-als-duenger/904/

Veganism is just a dead end.

Tormas
1 year ago

As Omnivor I don’t use it either

Saim0n
1 year ago

Using meat waste does not hurt any animal. 🤷

DerJens292
1 year ago
Reply to  Saim0n

Meat doesn’t eat.

Saim0n
1 year ago
Reply to  DerJens292

Only the animal is not slaughtered for the waste.

SpookyBatwing
1 year ago
Reply to  Saim0n

Then no more, but the animal had to die.

Saim0n
1 year ago
Reply to  SpookyBatwing

But not to get to the waste. To dispense with softeners does not prevent slaughter.

DerJens292
1 year ago

Then buy products with animal welfare, low resource consumption and pollutant emissions do not have animals at all.

https://www.sacredcow.info/blog/are-cow-farts-destroying-the-planet

Saim0n
1 year ago

In each group there are 2 or 3 people who fail the lifestyle of other people. I can well understand the arguments for the abandonment of animal foods. For most animals are ultimately kept for their production. Unfortunately, this also involves the often low animal welfare, resource consumption and pollutant emissions.

DerJens292
1 year ago

You’re right. But unfortunately there are 2 or 3 who do not enjoy the normal eaters.

Saim0n
1 year ago

Can they also, in my opinion, not contradict a vegan lifestyle. Which limits are imposed there, can every person decide for themselves.

DerJens292
1 year ago

Then the vegans could wear leather shoes. The cow skins are often thrown away because of uneconomical processing (living costs, environmental conditions).

Saim0n
1 year ago

The use of waste does not cause any suffering. That’s my argument.

DerJens292
1 year ago

The vegans would use it. These avoid these by-products because of the alleged animal suffering.

Saim0n
1 year ago

If wool and leather are to be regarded as waste products in meat production or, for other reasons, are not the reason for the killing of the animal, I do not know who it should be useless.

DerJens292
1 year ago

You wrote of: does not hurt the animal.

Does the animal hurt if you cut off his wool or the dead animal pull off the fur to make leather from it?

The animal is not slaughtered for the leather.

Saim0n
1 year ago

What do you mean “go”?

DerJens292
1 year ago

But leather shoes or sheepskin scarves go?