Bus signals right, overtaking at high km/h?

If the bus has its hazard lights on, I'm only allowed to overtake it at walking pace. However, if the bus signals left, I have to let it merge. But if it signals right, I'm allowed to overtake the bus at high speeds.

(1 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
17 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stadewaeldchen
1 year ago

There is no specific speed indication, it is called in the StVO

Buses of buses, trams and marked school buses, which stop at stops (signs 224), may only be carefully bypassed, even on the other hand.

You always have to count on passengers who want to get over the road.

martinreschke
1 year ago

This is governed by paragraph 1 StVO. Mutual consideration.

Stadewaeldchen
1 year ago
Reply to  martinreschke

Nee, here is more than 20 StVO insatiable

Sniffyz13
1 year ago

You can’t overtake him in this case.

martinreschke
1 year ago
Reply to  Derverscholl21

In paragraph 20, it is about passing the right. But also paragraph 1.

Sniffyz13
1 year ago
Reply to  Derverscholl21

But only 50km/h

Stadewaeldchen
1 year ago
Reply to  Sniffyz13

How do you get on the narrow board?

martinreschke
1 year ago

I didn’t know your fervical series and couldn’t be received in the valley of the unconscious. Now I want to tell you something unusual. I studied Kfz and trained myself as an assistant expert. This included, among other things, type training until acceptance of the driving licence and road user training. I was also involved as a traffic safety activist in a residential area. After the incorporation, I became TÜV examiner and took the examination as a driving instructor according to Federal Republic of Germany. Now I am a pensioner and nothing has changed negatively with regard to the theoretical road traffic law. Unfortunately, practice looks completely different. Don’t judge people you don’t know. It is not possible to interpret a chart of the regulations solo without any influence from others. Nice WE.

Stadewaeldchen
1 year ago

In my years of activity, among others in transport education, we have always advanced paragraph 1 as the top preamble.

Too much tegtmeier?

martinreschke
1 year ago

only to be carefully moved past is in paragraph 1. It’s all right. Here too, paragraph 1 is reflected. I don’t want to argue about the application Lex….. There’s something of aversion to laws and this is a regulation. Is it possible to equate these? In an extended sense, yes. In my years of activity, among others in transport education, we have always advanced paragraph 1 as the top preamble. In case of violations, it always comes to bear.

Stadewaeldchen
1 year ago

In paragraph 20, it is about passing the right.

No, this is only in para. 2 but not in paragraphs 1 and 3-6.

But also paragraph 1.

The §1 StVO is a catching paragraph, which then intervenes when nothing special is regulated. This is the case, however, with §20 there is a special regulation. Lex specialis is about lex generalis.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lex-specialis principle

Stadewaeldchen
1 year ago

Everyone is doing what he can best…

Paejexa
1 year ago

According to his statements, Sniffyz13 also finds violence well and denies climate change. I just think the guy’s fooling around.

Stadewaeldchen
1 year ago

Wasn’t he overwhelmed yesterday at the right in front of the left and left corner of the traffic?

Oh, yeah, there he was next to the trail.

Naja, nu isser eh inactive

Just temporary…

Antitroll1234
1 year ago

Wasn’t he overwhelmed yesterday at the right in front of the left and left corner of the traffic?

And now come with something complicated 🫣

Naja, nu isser eh inactive 🤷

Stadewaeldchen
1 year ago

What now? Not at all or at 50 km/h? Just look into the StVO if you don’t know.

https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stvo_2013/_20.html