… bei Krankenkasse, bei Verbraucherzentrale, bei Polizei, Ärztekammer woanders?
Ich bin z.B. bei mehreren ZÄ schon betrogen oder erpresst worden, weil die mich zu IGel gezwungen haben, die ich gar nicht brauchte.
(1 votes)
Loading...Hallo, war heute morgen beim Zahnarzt weil ich starke Schmerzen hatte seit gestern morgen (halbe Nacht nicht geschlafen). Der Zahn welcher schmerzt ist Wurzelbehandelt und jetzt leider an der Wurzelspitze entzündet. Die Ärztin schaute sich das nur an und drückte etwas mit dem Spiegel und sagte sie verschreibt mir Penicillin. Ist das Vorgehen richtig so…
Ich habe mit meiner Zunge die letzten Tage ganz hinten links, hinter diesen dicken Zähne entdeckt, dass da ein Zahn wächst. Das problem ist, dass da ein komplettes Stück von meinem Zahnfleisch abgeht. Was ist das?
Wie lange hat es bei euch gedauert ?
Hallo, ich bin 17 Jahre alt und will auf Amazon ein Geschenk für meine Eltern kaufen, aber damit es eine Überraschung bleibt sollten sie nichts davon mitkriegen. Wenn ich das Geschenk über einen Gutschein bestelle und meine Eltern während der Ankunft des Paketes nicht da sind, könnten sie es trotzdem irgendwie herausfinden?
Ich würde gerne die Kundenreaktion zu einer Geschäftsidee testen und zu dem Zweck Briefkastenwerbung verteilen, um anhand der Bestell-Anrufe die Attraktivität meiner Angebote in Erfahrung bringen. Ich möchte also bevor ich meine Geschäftsidee umsetze zuerst das Interesse potentieller Kunden an meinen Produkten in Erfahrung bringen Ist dies auch ohne: eine Veraufsabsicht und 2. ohne Gewerbeschein…
Do you know the definition of blackmail under German law?
Section 253
Extortion
(1) Anyone who needs a human being illegally with violence or by threatening with a sensitive evil to an act, toleration or omission, thereby adding to the wealth of the compelled or another disadvantage in order to enrich himself or a third party wrongly
As you say, they were not threatened with violence or evil. You were merely informed that a treatment can only take place with you under certain conditions, according to the treatment concept of the doctor concerned. This is his good right. If he has treatment methods that he considers to be correct and important, he can refuse the treatment if you do not agree with this treatment. Not the patients tell the doctor how to treat it. They merely agree or reject. It’s not blackmail. And I would be careful with such claims in Google Reviews
Fraud and extortion are offences that can of course be displayed to the police. But you should prove it. If you show someone and there are investigations that even lead to interrogations, etc., maybe someone gets hurt with it and the call of the shows will be damaged, it can of course come to considerable damages claims or to an ad for killing you.
Accordingly, be careful with such accusations. “Everyone is not the same as “true” or “expression”. And even if it was “smart”, I call it, it’s always two of them. One who’s messing up and one who’s messing up. If the doctors have strongly praised IGeL services, this is not prohibited. They can’t force you.
Otherwise, the dentist chamber will certainly also have a complaint point to which you can contact. In the event of a doubt, it is possible to make an effort in disputes involving the conciliation body which has all the chambers. But I’m prophesying that it doesn’t bring so much if there is no really problematic behavior.
So, if you’re upset because you fell in on doctors, take the trouble down and make it better the next time. If there really was a relevant evil behavior, you can complain. Just beware of the choice of words, because someone accused of a crime can be problematic. But please – consider whether you are annoying more about yourself or if there really was someone acting illegally.
No, you don’t have to prove anything. When an ad is sent, the police are only informed of a suspected offence.
If investigations are subsequently received, the police or the prosecutor shall be responsible for the evidence. If the investigations do not give sufficient burden of proof for a conviction, the investigation procedure shall be terminated.
This is not quite correct! Never disregard §164 StGB and §187 StGB! DorktorNoth has no such thing in his speeches! If it is found in the investigation procedure that the features are fulfilled, the allegedly “damaged” can warm up – if the accused also wants.
Especially in the case of disgusting statements (including also terms such as “complainant”), the prosecutor’s office is up to date and is in the process of taking investigations for the public interest even without request!
Good. The point is, of course, correct that the police or Public prosecution must prove it. I’m asking for the wrong way of expression.
Then give me the reshaping: “the accusation must be proveable”
You can complain to the doctor’s office.
But if you come as above, you will only reap a tired smile:)
No one forces you to any IgEL achievements or similar! It is only necessary to be able to speak with doctors at eye level.
Fraud and extortion are certainly not present. You just have to say what you want as a patient!
Your description above is completely subjective and contains no objective thoughts!
“You just have to say what you want as a patient!”
I said what I want.
The extortion then followed: “You either take the private power or we do not treat you at all.”
That would have been a reason for me to look for another doctor. It doesn’t just testify to a good doctor!
This is not forbidden at all. The dentist can choose whether and under what circumstances he treats you. If private services are included in his treatment plan and after his treatment concept and you do not agree to the treatment concept, he does not have to treat you either. Easy. You have a free doctor’s choice. Then you go to another ZA, but this is neither fraud nor extortion. That was an offer you can accept or cancel.
If that’s true, then why didn’t you get up and have left the practice for re-respect? Besides, if you don’t quite clearly tell what happened, you can’t provide you with correct information.
You have to prove that. And you probably can’t.
On the level, you can’t complain to the doctor’s chamber.
These are about 40 – 60 euros additional costs for you. This is a GOZ performance and for that you certainly got an invoice. There is no accounting position for legal insurers. You have certainly explained what and why the facial arch must/be created? For what should be done. Do you get inlays, prostheses, other dentures, orthodontics or a CMD (FAL/FDL) treatment? U.U. treatment is actually required. With a specialist who treated CMD you should have paid the complete treatment from your own pocket.
If you felt insecure, you could easily get a second opinion on another ZA.
Okay, I’m out of here.
as far as I’ve researched this is not an IgEL performance …
Maybe you can just contact the health insurance or get a 2nd dentist opinion on the subject due to the treatment plan.
arbitrary hinge axis determination
WAS for a private service should that have been?
Of course you stay the same when it’s okay. After several moves, unfortunately, I haven’t found one yet.
Sounds a little silly for me. If you could succeed with a complaint, I can hardly estimate.
You don’t seem to have found the right dentist yet. It is not so easy to change, but in the best case it remains for several decades with the same doctor.
No, not everyone told me the same thing. It was about completely different things at the time, which is why I had to go on looking.
But if several dentists tell you the same thing, there must be something that the treatment cannot be done as you imagine.
The only reason is because I have already had several ZÄs, and therefore waiting for an urgent treatment for months, and time is increasing.
Yes, always ask for time and then ask with friends/recognants or here… usually you get good advice.
Just because I’ve finally been informed, I’m finally seeing how I’ve often been zoomed. I used to not know all that.
You don’t get that in writing!
No, it would be a witness.
Perhaps such a procedure is also completely legal. Have you been informed about whether this is actually illegal?
Does that mean I have to give this statement in writing?
Negative reviews on platforms already bring something. I have heard different experiences regarding reports at the Medical Chamber.
The negative reviews do not have the power of action, as many think. In addition, ratings are only limited to the affected physician, the loss is insignificant.
I experienced that differently! I was also told by doctors whether I could not make a negative assessment with a positive ‘cover’. So no matter what, it doesn’t seem to be. And it is already that practices with negative reviews have to struggle partly with a lack of patients.
can’t negotiate.
So I am PVK myself also “IGeL- Threat” but I say in front “is not”.
I therefore find it ridiculous to organize at the Radau Medical Chamber.
You can always complain. But let’s be honest: if you don’t want a treatment, you’ll just say that if they don’t leave you alone, you’ll make an appointment and revoke it or say it and find another dentist.
I think that a dentist with a pre-contained weapon really forced you into a treatment is unlikely… and according to this, the medical chamber will probably also think ‘why does he actually do it?’
The fact that some privately paid services are a ‘plus’ in terms of cash benefits is another point. But there is no compulsion from this alone. For example, no one forces you to remove your wisdom teeth under general anesthesia.
“Everyone from this circumstance does not result in compulsion.”
The compulsion is due to the extortion: “either you take private power or we do not treat you at all.”
Although I can continue to search for new ZÄ, but if I have now defied all the ZÄ in my place and the treatment is already pressing for the lost time, I will eventually be forced to take the ZA if I want to get a treatment at all.
And then what will keep you from looking for another dentist?
By the way: That ONE does that… one thing. That ALL the many dentists that you have deflated so you put the pistol on your chest is rather unlikely when you sleep there as a normal patient.
I have actually received the statement exactly once, and that was with a patient who was also to remove wisdom teeth from the jaw surgeon and who started crying and shaking without general anesthesia. Then the doctor has also spoken a word of power about ‘either psychological/psychiatric attesting with regard to anxiety disorder, then the checker takes over general anesthesia OR she pays herself OR he does not treat’
But that was simply because he didn’t want to take responsibility for this patient.
“And what will keep you from looking for another dentist?”
First of all, nothing and I’m looking for it. But if you’ve been through a series of ZÄ in his place of residence, the other things have done, where I know afterwards that it wasn’t okay…
You always have the opportunity to enter your complaint with the respective Kassenarztverein or the competent medical chamber, depending on what it is.
In case of complaints to the Medical Association or the Association of Cassidy, your complaint will also be forwarded to the respective doctor who is asked to comment. This opinion will also be sent to you.
Such a small edge note:
With such accusations you should handle very carefully. Such accusations should only be made if one can actually prove them! Otherwise, in the event of a dispute (especially in criminal law) you draw the shorts!
If you mean being cheated or extorted, you can (if you can) view the corresponding dentist.
I can’t imagine how this should work to be forced into a service that should be paid privately.
The compulsion follows from the statement: “You either take the private service or you can look for another ZA.”
And if you have already shut down the other ZÄ in the place of residence and pushes the time because they have held one for weeks, you must eventually come to potte and accept the treatment.
And what did he blackmail you with? If you don’t want any IgE services, you’ll stretch them off. That’s so simple. I don’t think the ZÄ will have put a gun on your chest.
I definitely rejected her – and yes, you can say that with the gun.
hope he has a gunshot