Brille?
hi,
Ich w/12 habe eigentlich nur Brillenträger in meiner Familie also Mum, Dad und meine zwei älteren Schwestern. Die jüngere meiner zwei älteren Schwestern hatt ihre Brille mit 15/16 Jahren bekommen, die ältere mit 12/13 Jahren.
Ich komm hald generell eher nach der älteren also ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit dass ich meine Brille auch bald bekomme sehr hoch oder? Weil ich binn hald auch gerade 12
The likelihood of needing glasses at some point is probably higher than if none of your other family needs one.
Also getting glasses is not necessarily the same. Probabilities do not use much for this, however, because the case then occurs or not that you need glasses, for example, with 14 or for the driver’s license or not.
The main thing is to see well. If necessary, then with glasses! If everyone else is wearing one at your home, it might be a bit easier than if you are the only one!
No, it can’t be predicted at all. I know people where a parent is short-sighted and one of the children is far-sighted. Or also those where the mother and father are short-sighted and their children do not need glasses. With me it is reversed, my father is only slightly short-sighted, my mother has eagle eyes, but I am very short-sighted and my brother is even very extreme. Crazy thing about genetics.
Everything can – nothing has to.
You sound like you can’t wait to finally get a glasses. I’m not comprehensible, but what do you think in a few years you’ll find it so great to srin, I doubt it.
from an “expert” this is already a damn bad answer. Of course, the visual strength is partly due to inheritance, like everything else. The probability for the FS is therefore actually higher than for someone where both parents are emmetropic. Of course there are exceptions here and there, as elsewhere. Of course, someone whose parents are 1.40 tall even 2 meters tall. It’s probably not
Then you did not read my answer attentively or totally misunderstood the text. Especially the separately written sentence says that the possibility of inheriting a certain misunderstanding exists, but is not secured.
As a professional in the field of optic, you will surely have encountered families with the most varied misconceptions where you ask yourself how this fits.
The fact that there is a chance that in the next generation there will be a recurrence of parents, is well known to everyone, yet there is no guarantee that it will come like this – nothing else I have written.
If according to the “higher probability” according to you, all siblings of the questioner are wearers of glasses and they would also be affected by it, their family would be at 100%. Doesn’t fit what different models calculate in terms of inheritance, is it? If one sees it, the probability that the youngest member of the family will be ill-considered would no longer be so high.
But no matter, I have my frights shortsightedness, although the likelihood for something was quite low and therefore I say from my own experience “all can – nothing has to”.
It doesn’t have to be. Systems for short-sightedness are not inherited the short-sightedness itself. Genetics is a dice game. It doesn’t have to be that you need glasses. Maybe you’re lucky.
There’s no rule, I can only say, let’s surprise you.
I can’t read into the future, but I can tell you it doesn’t mean you need glasses.
that has nothing to do with your age, but with your eyes
and if they are all right, only the ophthalmologist can answer you
Only if you look bad, you need glasses.
No shit Sherlock 🤌🏻