Proof with GCF?
Dear mathematicians,
I would like some feedback on this task, whether this would be a feasible approach or, if not, I would be very happy to receive a tip for one!
Thanks!
Dear mathematicians,
I would like some feedback on this task, whether this would be a feasible approach or, if not, I would be very happy to receive a tip for one!
Thanks!
Hey, I have the equation here and now I want to determine the vertices and asymptotes. It would be great if someone could send me the calculation steps. Vg
Hello, I have to present a topic in class to improve my grade. These are my results= I used this site for this: The book's website explains it quite poorly (in my opinion), and I'm worried I misunderstood something. Could someone please take a look at it? Thanks in advance 😊
Hallo, wie kann ich Nr. 5 und 6 lösen?
Kann mir jemand helfen?
Kann mir jemand erklären und hilfen wie man die untere tabelle ausfüllt und wo oder was man schauen muss um die tabelle auszufüllen?
Your proof is wrong.
You claim and use that kgV(a., b.) = a. ⋅ b. is. However, this does not apply in general, but only if a. and b. are part-nerd.
For example, on the one hand…
… and on the other hand…
kgV(4, 6) = 12 here not equal to 4 ⋅ 6 = 24.
===================
Here again about more formal with formula mode…
That the statement is true is obvious. Because a cannot have a greater divider than a and kgV(a, b) definitely has a as a divider.
But I don’t think the proof is formal enough. You do not prove that T(a*b) and T(a) have exactly T(a) as a cut.
Of which: The smallest common multiple is not equivalent to the multiplication of the numbers.
See, for example, 12 and 18, multiple is 36.