Bei der Wörtlichen Rede den Begleitsatz weglassen?
Ich lese oft Bücher und schreibe auch selbst Geschichten. Deshalb hab ich eine Frage: wenn man ein Gespräch zwischen zwei Personen schreibt und die beiden immer abwechselnd etwas sagen, kann man dann den Begleitsatz weglassen oder muss man trotzdem noch sagte, meinte, fragte, erklärte dranhängen?
Hello AmandaPanda,
in many books, the accompanying sentence is also omitted.
If the first time a person says something and the other person answers something, you should write an accompanying sentence. If then the first person is the second, third, fourth, … mal something says the escort can be omitted.
For clarity, you should change the line after each phrase. Then readers can better follow who says what.
If, however, a third person says something, then it must have an accompanying sentence and if the two other persons have to speak only to two again then the accompanying sentences will be the first time again. I know that wasn’t your question with the third person, but I think I know well.
Okay, thank you, I would have done this
I’d just put a dash when the speaker changes. Of course, you can always start a new paragraph.
A conversation, which consists only of literal speech, seems more natural to me than if it is always interrupted by insertion.
Hello,
the accompanying sentence may be omitted.
If the literal speech does not have an accompanying sentence, it should be noted that all that is actually spoken is in quotation marks.
In many books, the escort is also omitted if it is clear who speaks!
Yes, leave it, if it is clear who speaks!
Need not necessarily, unless it is unclear who says what (e.g. at the beginning when a break was created by action etc)
Nevertheless, a companion kit looses the whole thing.
Of course, this can only explain it – because mimik can’t read it?
No, you can leave.