Basiskonzepte von Lebewesen = Kennzeichen des Lebenden?
Hallo alle zusammen,
ich schreibe bald eine Biologieklausur und der Lehrer meinte, dass einer der Themen die Kennzeichen des Lebenden ist.
Das Problem ist, dass wir nur die Basiskonzepte der Lebewesen mit einem anderen Lehrer behandelt haben und ich jetzt nicht weiß, ob das beides das gleiche ist (also die Kennzeichen des Lebenden = Basiskonzepte der Lebewesen).
Characteristics are zb evolution, development bewung irritability, metabolism, growth, reproduction.
In some cases, however, it is not quite clear. In fact, a flame or fire also has some of these features zb a kind of metabolism, movement it can become bigger and can ignite itself or by flying sparks in another place as something as prophylactic. There is no evolution or development in fire. Of course fire is not alive
If zb reproductive is an indispensable feature of a living being, then male mules or liger would not be alive. You can’t replant otherwise naturally have all the features. They’re beings.
It is not 100% clear for all features.
I do not consider evolution as necessary, because it is actually based on coincidence and happy defects. When a being grows through cloning, the clone still lives. Something perfect viable is more broken than it gets better.
When moving it is similar: there are beings that remain in a place for their life. The first bacteria have taken the nutrients that are thickened from close proximity. Of course, viability was an advantage, but were these beings dead? irritability analogous.
That’s right:
Basic concepts of biology
https://studyflix.de/biology/basic concepts-biology-4922
License plate
https://studyflix.de/biology/kennzeichen-des-lebens-3406
Just look into the textbook
The problem is that there are different views. I would write:
presence of genetic material (DNA),
Metabolic, i.e. absorption and delivery of substances.
Increase