ByYaHobby
What if you replace the train drivers with AI, they only have to accelerate and brake, that would certainly be possible with moderate effort
Then there would be no more strikes and costs would be reduced by eliminating redundant workers.
(1 votes)
Loading...Sure, if the brake valve stops working, it's nice to have a backup, but why is the Akerman valve located directly in the driver's cab and not connected to an emergency lever or wire underneath, like the emergency brake in the wagon? I mean, it's not exactly cool to open a 5 bar line.
I wonder if there are positive examples of successful rail transport from an economic perspective, where the state doesn't have to provide support.
Somehow I can't find anything on the Internet
I was on the tram today, and in a compartment alone, there were 3-4 people walking around with a scanner, asking for tickets. I showed them my DE ticket from my phone, and someone scanned it. After they had scanned just a few people, they all sat in a group of four next to me….
Sounds like a very great idea as soon as locomotive drivers only give gas and brakes we should change it right away.
In the meantime, we may be able to switch to Homeoffice when the 5G expansion continues at the railway line.
Okay, why isn’t that yet? Did the companies sleep or how do you imagine? The system train is far too complex to leave it to an AI, which cannot make any decisions at all!
Unfortunately, it is not that simple, otherwise it would have been implemented. But the journey without GdL is soon possible.
https://www.thalesgroup.com/en/worldwide-transport/main-line-rail/news/autonome-zuege-die-reise-beginnt-hier
And you seriously believe that if that were possible, it would not have happened long ago.