Auswandern in Länder mit wenig Absicherung?
Hab schon einige erlebt, die Auswandern in Länder mit wenig Absicherung.
Gegen das auswandern an sich sag ich ja nix. Und hab schon oft das Argument gehört, sie würden auswandern wegen den geringen Lebenshaltungskosten.
Die meisten Auswanderer, die ich erlebt habe, sind in afrikanische oder asiatische Länder zum Beispiel Thailand und Kenia.
Über manche Verhältnisse in Deutschland kann man sich vielleicht streiten.
Aber!!!
Lebensbedrohlicher Notfall in Deutschland: innerhalb von Minuten ist ein Rettungswagen und Notarzt da. Ich selbst wohne auf dem Land (nächster Nachbar 4 km entfernt, nächster Laden mit Lebensnotwendigen Dingen 10 km entfernt) Trotzdem fahre ich in ein Krankenhaus (gibt 8 in der „näheren“ Umgebung) nicht weiter als 40 km (die beiden nähesten sind 20 km entfernt).
Wir haben Renten-, Sozial- und Krankenversicherungen. Unsere medizinische Mindestversorgung ist recht gut. Klar wird bei uns alles teurer. Aber die Preise in anderen (selbst europäischen Ländern) haben sich trotz dortiger höherer Verdienste ganz schön gewaschen.
Im großen und ganzen geht es uns doch hier ganz gut. Um sonst wollen ja viele Flüchtlinge nicht zu uns. Und einige Ausländer kommen extra zum studieren.
Und dann kommen die, die unbedingt nach Thailand oder Kenia auswandern wollen (und es auch tun).
Wo ich mich frage, warum dann nicht auswandern nach Norwegen, Schweden, Dänemark oder Schweiz.
Ja klar, höhere Kosten. Aber eben deutlich besseres Schul-, Ausbildungs- und Sozialsystem als in Deutschland.
Und die, die Auswandern, sind die, die über die deutsche (und europäische) Politik schimpfen, aber nichts tun um was zu ändern (und ein Anfang wäre mal, wählen gehen)
Und ich traue mich mal zu behaupten, wenn plötzlich 75 – 80 % aller Wahlberechtigten wählen gehen würden, würden viele Politiker und Parteien dumm aus der Wäsche schauen
(1 votes)
Loading...
Not everyone in Germany is living the same way and the differences are likely to be relatively large in terms of needs. Security is a further term and means not to have an ambulance or hospital nearby for all people, but to have enough money for food, accommodation, etc.
As far as emergency medicine in other countries is concerned, in Germany one is often somewhat superfluous and simply assumes that in Kenya or Thailand there must be pure chaos, which does not correspond to reality on site 1 to 1. And even if this security is often only apparent safety (e.g. in the case of a heart attack, respiratory arrest and much more, the ambulance with its 15min in many cases is too late), it is possible to align its housing and residences in almost all countries of the world afterwards by dwelling urban or directly near a hospital.
There are many people, even in Germany, trying to bring life and survival into a balance and who tend to live or experience something more, and to protect others more about survival and health. And depending on how someone defines these needs, life often inhibits survival and survival. Then you have to find a middle way and everyone is looking for their own balance. And for one, it’s exciting to live in another country with the opportunity to see and discover many things, no matter whether mortality could be higher and for others it brings more security if, for example, their savings get more purchasing power. And the reasons are just as versatile.
And to your last point with politics, in a democracy, the majority of people should prevail, but on the one hand it can be observed that this is not always the case in Germany, and on the other hand that often a very primitive majority opinion prevails in some respects. The fact that there is no desire to vote should not only be comprehensible, but also gives a more quality of life, if one does not represent such a majority-conform opinion, because otherwise one is only annoyed by his fellow human beings and that does not have to be.
There are people who are more important to security and people who are more important to their freedoms and who are also willing to give up security.
I wouldn’t make it easy, but at least I can understand it very well. I’ve been playing with the thought more often.
Frequently, these emigrants return to Germany very quickly to countries with insufficient security in the event of a crisis!
Right – baptize on the beach, but if the liver no longer goes back to the German social system… that is of course very comfortable.
Unfortunately, this is no longer working with the return because the money is missing for the return trip.
And that’s what I mean. People are fine, and they are walking out.
There is a stroke of fate (self-indebted or unindebted) coming into a financial emergency.
Medical care is not possible or only inadequately, the money is missing because you have never worked there or hardly worked there you fall through the very karge social grid.
And you sit untreated and firmly somewhere in the middle.