Ausbildung vor Studium – sinnvoll oder zeitverschwendung?
Hey,
Ich bin 16/w und habe mir sehr viel Gedanken über meine Berufswahl gemacht. Von den Studiengängen her interessiere ich mich besonders für Jura & Medizin. Nun habe ich die Frage, ob eine Ausbildung 2-3 Jahre vor einen der Studiengänge ratsam ist oder eher nicht?
Ich habe zwei Wege:
➡️ Entweder ich wähle Jura und gehen dann folgenden Weg (da ich auch den Beruf Hauptkommisarin bei der Polizei in Betracht ziehe) :
2-jährige Ausbildung als Polizistin
– > 6-jähriges Jurastudium – > danach kann ich als Anwältin oder Hauptkommisarin/Polizistin tätig werden
Oder:
➡️ Ich studiere Medizin und mache die volle Ausbildung zum Facharzt für Humangenetik oder Neurologie, dafür könnte ich auch erstmal eine Ausbildung machen:
-> 2-3-jährige Ausbildung als MTA – > 6 Jahre Medizinstudium – > 3-jährige Ausbildung zum Facharzt
–
Oder ich lasse die Ausbildungen am Anfang komplett weg, jedoch wollte ich bei diesem Fall fragen, ob ich trotzdem Polizistin werden kann mit einem Jura Studium ohne Ausbildung?
Ach so und ich möchte keine Ausbildung machen, weil meine Noten nicht reichen, sondern um davor eine gewisse Berufserfahrung zu haben.
(2 votes)
Loading...
Hello
I will divide my response into the two areas. Parent with the study!
Jura:
The law school has been a very long study. Usually you need 5-6 years for pure study. In addition, there is a 2-year referendum. The study already has it in itself and demands a lot. For example, if you start studying at 18 years, you would only with the study only finished with 25-26.
Before, you want to do the two-year training with the police. So you’d be finished with 27-28.
This is a very long way and you probably have forgotten most of the training after studying and/or have only half knowledge. You need to learn some skills completely. It takes time again and is exhausting.
You could turn it around. So first the study and then the training, that would probably be something more effective.
But you can also complete parts of the Praxsizeit that are necessary for the lawyer at the police. But it is necessary for your superior to be a lawyer. However, this should not be a problem with large police departments and should run smoothly.
With your studies you can go directly to the higher administration service, so to the top. That’s not a problem and you have to do a training. At least I think so. I’m sure they will, but then the area will be heavy. You also get training and everything that belongs to it.
I also know a police director who studied law. All right.
Medicine:
After all, medical studies last for 6.5 years and then have an education of 4-6 years. So I would also not recommend training. Yes, the practice certainly does well, but the knowledge you get during your studies also so fast and then you still have an education. If you were a specialist, you’d only be at 31-33 when everything goes on plan. It takes too long and you have “senseless” qualifications.
Summary:
You’re doing this because of the professional experience. But I think that’s not necessary. During your studies (medical), you have to do compulsory internships and also hospitate with doctors. This is then completely enough for the experience and the training before is pointless.
The same thing with Jura actually. You will also be able to gain experience yourself. Although more rarely in the form of internships, police and law have little common ground (at least at the beginning). Yes, right and co. But as a lawyer, you don’t learn to shoot it and policemen are more likely to have a crash course right if you just do the training.
Therefore, I would start studying directly. At least in the course. There are others where I would recommend that.
It’s been a bit long now. Sorry
No problem, I think it’s great that you always give such a detailed and wise answer
Thank you
To medicine.
I wouldn’t say “sinless qualification.” You get a lot of practical experience, you have to make fewer famulatures and learn skills that will come to good later. In PJ, for example, one is not completely thrown up at the beginning, because one is familiar with the processes and has already had many experiences in dealing with patients. In addition, the world has been seen from a different perspective and is more considerate and better superior in cooperation with other professional groups. By the way, after the doctor, you have to work for more than 30 years in the profession and know beforehand, before you are actually admitted there is a lot. not so bad.
But you have sledgehammer through the Famulaturen, the practical year and the internships about 1.8 years experience. The training lasts 2 years. So it’s meaningless in my eyes. For example, during the nursing internship, you already know the handling and the areas that interest you. Same thing with the Famulatur. I don’t know a doctor who did a training before.
You could also consider a dual study. So study and training parallel.
Otherwise, it is quite good to have done something practical before studying. This changes the view of things (instead of primary school, high school, university, practical shock)
Having a professional experience is always good, possibly there is another profession.
But some qualifications are meaningless and you are still studying when you are 30. Not always the best choice
A “training” is absolutely no advantage for studying after. This strange idea, however, seems to be astonishingly widespread only in Germany, why always. (Maybe a factor is that in Germany there are no vocational schools with university entrance authorization. Idiotic, but politically apparently wanted.)
Some help her to have a certain break before studying and to reconsider the decision for studying. Instead of FSJ, military service or something.
Some help them to have a reasonable job to fund their studies.
Otherwise, it’s just waste of time. And also waste of resources: the purpose of training is to actually work in the profession concerned.
Hi.
if you don’t get a place to study immediately and you can do that by training in the appropriate admission rate.
All too much benefits are not provided by training but in studies.
What does the training really do to you? You are finished with your studies only later and can probably not start with your training.
Get the training ahead.
By training you learn the practice first.
Then you’ll be a bit ahead of your fellow students later. Because you’re better off in some areas.
Since theory and practice are sometimes far apart.
In addition, an education before studying makes an impression. Since you also know what you’re talking about and not just about the theory where you’ve learned.
Ultimately, it depends on what you want to do in the end.
Personally, I honestly do not see any advantage of making a vocational training MTA before a medical study. Perhaps you will find one or the other a bit easier in your studies, because you already know some terms and also activities – and especially practical. But the training “costet” you also a few years and the added value should be manageable.
In other areas, this may look a little different.
For example, if you want to become a police officer, you don’t get around the police training. However, the additional law studies could bring you clearly forward in the police runway and take a place in the elevated or higher service. a leadership function in the police department.