Are there single induction hobs with stepless power control?
Hello,
Most very inexpensive individual hobs simply operate with an on/off intermittent switch on the magnetic field. Are there any (affordable) hobs where the magnetic field power can actually be permanently reduced?
So instead of 2000 watts on/off, something where the field is actually electronically controlled permanently and only induces, for example, 400 to 800 watts into the bottom of the pot?
If so, are there any specific recommendations for under 100 euros?
Best regards and thanks in advance from Gnurfy.
(1 votes)
Loading...
5 seconds interval is of course arg, at my cooking place it is 1-2 seconds. The reason is quite simple: for example, to realize 10 levels, you need 1-10 waves in the minimum case. In the most unfavorable case, 4 cookers share a phase, then you already need 40 waves to “use” all 4 cookers once reihum. With full heating power, each cooking station is still only 25% of the time, and you can see that. It is also assumed that not only a single wave is taken, because the induction coil is not immediately in resonance, but you need a somewhat longer “minimum package”, and then you just get out at this packet length/frequency.
Tip from practice: pots with thin floor are super for gas cookers, but not so well suited for induction.
Better take cookware with thick, heavy soil. The mass stores the energy and thus ensures a pleasant smoothing of the waviness in the temperature curve.
I am electrically not as completely unmistakable and stupid as at least two members want to make it sound particularly high rusty and superbly here.
But one thing is interesting again:
Seconds interval is of course arg, at my cooking place it is 1-2 seconds. The reason is quite simple: for example, to realize 10 levels, you need 1-10 Waves.
Do you mean with “waves” the minimum number of magnetic field reversals by time for electrical short circuit (eddy current behavior) in the iron core of a pot bottom for induction?
Or also (a little exaggerated) to you… there is inductively generally something that could induce, for example, in 10 micropulses per second with the aim of 200 Wattsecus into a pot floor instead of only very long-pulse with one to two pulses per 10 seconds in the same amount of energy?
I just want to understand it technically only before I look for things that are technically possible. with 2 KW rated field power would not be possible at all.
A professional induction pot with 5 kilos of soft iron plate in the pot bottom secheidet for hundreds of euros, of course, but even DAS would already be a partial solution.
As I already have in the thread of @
wrote, I do not seek for myself personally and in the present also no substitute for MIR dahoam. I also have casting plate solutions for demand…☺
LG
The wave results from our 50 Hz AC power supply. It is simply switched on and off in the zero passage. The shaft is not cut off as in the light dimmer, but the entire shaft is either taken or omitted. Only in this way is it possible to switch the inductive load, which is exhausting for the network, and to keep harmonic disturbances (“overwaves”) as low as possible.
You helped me in as far as I need to look for a different pumpkin gift for my mom.
That’s honest, and that’s why the award to you here.
Thank you and dear greetings from Gnurfy. 🤗
But more radio-frequency, you could transfer much more targeted, wouldn’t you? Induction methods are already much longer than induction hobs in technical applications. ( keywords “Soldering & welding“… or hardening…
The package control is customary and technically very sensible. The bottom of each cooking vessel means the thermally very good.
Set the time constants in relation to your desired pulse width modulation. And you also have the basic principle of power electronics:
Switching instead of proportional resistance position
Your idea is not comprehensible to me.
I asked a very reasonable question here, and I would just like a reasonable and comprehensible answer to that.
What is technically opposed to a basic power reduction of the exciter field during induction, so that the cooking material in the pot is more or less uniform, instead of always boiling up in short intervals over time.
Are there at least devices which have a higher interval rate per unit of time than a second-by-second clocking such as, for example, 6 seconds and 1 second at a set heating power of, for example, 200 watts?
Since the thermal time constant of the cooking vessels is always large against the second range, what should this effect?
I have the suspicion that you additionally have a temperature control in operation – which has such disadvantages in practice, because it cannot regulate the temperature – as well? The boiling point during cooking does not shift at a certain air pressure, so it is not possible to regulate any performance with temperature control – this is always the case.
It may be useful when roasting – never cooking.
Something wrong…
Instead of 100 ms Full and 900 MS Zero, if necessary. something like 10 ms full and 90 ms low for more uniform energy consumption in the iron core of the pot floor… explains it better. ☺
My existing Indu-Kochfeld only allows performance level control, or Temperature sensor detection too. It’s not manipulated either.
Is there now such cooking fields with a time-tighter interval rate, or not. If you want to remain so declining, we will break down here better.
Yes, every Ceranfeld does. Induction the energy pulse has been fed to the serious point.
If the real induction is, good cooks use Ceran exactly because of what you are looking for. even cooking. And should it be induction in the larger pot (without lid) is a larger air supply, which does not allow the cooked product to boil so strongly and on television could have the effect of even chelens.
For induction, whether it costs 100€ or as my stove costs 4000€, the phases are stepped. 1 is perfect for keeping warm 9 cooks throughout. It doesn’t matter the potatoes, they’re not softer.
So get your ma a cerium plate and finish.
______________________________
In the essay no one has ruled here unfriendly, only one tells you that this was you will not be possible on induction..
You have to live with that too.
But I’m trying to do it with you at the time of the Enlightenment.
My cooktop currently sends full power to the exciter field in the setting “200 Watt” for about a second and is then inactive for 5 seconds. Is there an induction field that makes DASS more subtle?
For example, then each 1/10 second the pulse and 5/10 seconds inactive?
Do you understand what I mean?
Yes the stages I write, Already wrote!
1 is perfect for keeping warm 9 cooks throughout.
Adjust stairs before room height are 2.50m (in a pot of boiling point 100°C)
At 9 stages, the step height is significantly smaller than at only 6 stages. They must also come to 2.50 m height and 100° C.
That’s what you think
And dissolve the middle of the stage. You can find exactly what grade is on/off in the BD that you can retrieve online.
But again why no ceran field, if that does what you want. But the induction doesn’t do what you want.
Is it logical to get what exactly meets the requirements?
Just because everything screams after induction?
What isn’t the matter? just because I don’t know how long exactly the stages are? We’re trying to explain something you don’t take, radically reject, I didn’t even really read the feeling. Why?
And don’t want to? Just wanting to say that name jetzt my BD pre-crew, but lying in the bedroom on the laundry cabinet in a tin box. That’s the name of the head to get only GG sleeps he’ll have to get out at 03:00.
The values will not be available as a finished table, there are too many cooktops. You can only choose a cooktop online and download the BD down there you will find the info.
And if I write Ceran fits better (what does it do if you think logically) then write
I WILL ABER INDUKTION!
and the theme is from the table.
But I don’t think it will. You don’t want to accept that there is no perfect solution for everything.
Too bad you don’t want to help me any more. I’ll just wait for more answers.
Take care of the discounts. I have my single plate. It is of course regulatable and has cost something around 50 euros.
I don’t know a single non-controllable “plate.”
Personally I already have a single hob for approx. 30 euros, and I can now also deal with it very well in its peculiarities.
I’m looking for something more harmoniously controllable for my 70-year-old mother as an energy saving option for her small and warm meal.
I often look into cooking shows, and that it bubbles on induction in those usually quite evenly, instead of always bubbling on every few seconds in their statements such as e.g. “Let’s continue to simmer on low heat” …
Thank you for your kind admission. ☺👍
Your old lady will be hard to do with modern technology, is not different to me.
The modern induction fields are actually much more complicated than in cooked form. I have both and I can tell you that intuitive operation, like at the stove, is not possible. I always struggle with it, especially since I really use the single plate very rarely.