Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
11 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rammstein53
3 months ago

For this, one should first define what is to be understood as a “low” number.

  • positive and close to zero. If so, epsilon/2 is still lower for epsilon > 0. The halving can often be continued.
  • as large as possible but negative. It is also true, because at each a < 0, 2*a goes even more into negative. The doubling can often be continued.
Hamburger02
3 months ago

What’s low? Is that the smallest number or the number with the smallest amount?

1) would be:
-1/(1 – 0,period9)

(2)
1 – 0,Periode9

Aurel8317648
3 months ago

Yes, of course, because for each number one can still think a smaller one.

The question is more how or where they exist. What distinguishes their type of existence from the way, such as humans, cats or stones exist?

Halbrecht
3 months ago

as soon as you talk about “infinitely”, you already say that there can be no concrete.

Finniboy241006
3 months ago

Yes, here: -8 (adjust the 8 inclined by 90°.)

LG Finn 18 ☺️

RSL8a
3 months ago

Yes actually only in heat and temperature it is -273 degree the absolute zero point

Rango82
3 months ago

Yes, makes no difference whether positive or negative numbers.

Takasha
3 months ago

The numbers of commas are just as endless.

teehouse
3 months ago
Reply to  Wasser262

In the body of real numbers there is no smallest number! On the other hand, in the natural figures!

Takasha
3 months ago
Reply to  Wasser262

The lowest is 0!

0,000384 is higher than 0.