Are clubs like PSG and Man City still considered traditional clubs?
(1 rating, 1 votes, rated)You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...
(1 rating, 1 votes, rated)You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...
Hello Kaetzchen2004,
no PSG and Manchester City are not traditional associations, although they have long been purchased by large companies.
One has nothing to do with the other. Manchester City has been there for one or two centuries. Honestly, it makes me think that Manchester City (I like it by the way) cannot be a traditional association. Manchester City has a lot of history.
No, more profit associations.
No, not at the moment. Man City rather, but PSG in no case
Of course, at least Manchester City.
No. More clubs
Tradition is necessary. Both have become good because of the money.
PSG had brought 95 European Cups..
This was 1996, not 1995
Wow 95. Nevertheless, the team is without tradition. Even the Bundesliga clubs, except Leipzig, are better.
What's that got to do?
PSG had previous players like Rai (Brother of Socrates) or Ronaldinho. Didn't George Weah play there? And Pedro Pauleta.
PSG has more legends than 90% of Buli clubs
Psg still has no tradition 🤦 ♂️ ♂️
Nevertheless, it is not a traditional club. You heard nothing from PSG
He thinks PSG exists since 2012 🤣🤣🤣
PSG has no tradition, but money.
PSG has more tradition than many Buli clubs lol
What does this have to do with tradition? I understand I think your thoughts gear but that still has nothing to do with tradition in the sense.
Since someone who's completely bad, like he doesn't think he could get a cup?
Man City might not be like that right now. PSG not.