Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
12 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
segler1968
10 months ago

But something like that. I am 56 and still know the necessary and sufficient conditions for maxima, turning points, etc. And I can still derive. Integrating makes something… But in doubt, Wolfram Alpha helps.

ProfFrink
10 months ago

You don’t learn anything like that. It’s “beautiful” mathematics. That’s right for school. In practice, it is difficult to use because most of the relationships cannot be pressed into the representation of a polynomial function.

And where there is a proper mathematical approach, such as in theoretical physics or astronomy, one has to do it immediately with nichlinear differential equation systems which, in any case, can only be solved numerically with abundant computing power.

Curve discussion is mathematics for connoisseurs.

ChrisGE1267
10 months ago

I can even prove the prime payment rate to de La Vallée Poussin… 🙂

DaKaBo
10 months ago

I’m not T50 yet, but no, I can’t.

It’s not a loss in my everyday life. It would be worse, I could not calculate a fraction, percentage bill, three-piece, areas and volumes. 🙈

NorbertWillhelm
10 months ago

Only the differentials, because I only have the school up to 11. Class (G8).

NorbertWillhelm
10 months ago

Look at me reading wrong. Not intentionally, I’m sorry. Then I guess you have to figure out my answer.

Nelson100
10 months ago

Even with the best will not.

The mathematical possibility for me to be able to calculate areas under curves could have been useful in certain situations.

FataMorgana2010
10 months ago

Of course. It’s not very complicated.

Rina2020204
10 months ago

I loved that at school.

Pepppo
10 months ago

Yeah, because I’m very smart.

But I usually ask others only after the circular area depending on the radius.

Take 20-30%.

It’s funny.

RStroh
10 months ago

Give me some refreshment.

HarryXXX
10 months ago

Not more