Amelanotic melanoma?
I've already posted a similar question regarding the spot. I've already been to a dermatologist, and he said it's definitely not skin cancer. Now I've read that non-pigmented melanoma (amelanotic melanoma) is often considered harmless and is overlooked due to lack of pigmentation. Can you trust a dermatologist? And has anyone ever experienced something like this?
Either you believe the skin doctor or you have to go to another and get your second opinion.
Or you trust the users who made their degree on the YouTube unit and then I wonder what we have doctors for.
Without crap: The annual skin cancer screening, what I’m doing with me is done with a high-resolution camera. Only in this size can you really say something about it. But an experienced dermatologist can almost say at a glance what places need to be assessed more accurately.
The places that I considered critical to me found the skin doctor boring because of carcinogenicity, for which he found a dozen others, which would be unthinkable to me, which are now observed for several years (luckily largely unchanged).
I was already in screening and now again because of the thing with the skin doctor. It’s been a blase right after I’ve worked dry…then I scratched it up at night and the blasphemy’s gone, but this kind was there. In google, unfortunately, the thema black skin cancer is often read that it is unpigmented and often incorrectly diagnosed…because again the question here.
So you’re more likely to trust strange people on the Internet than a studied skin doctor?
With permission, but then you can’t help.