Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MaxMusterman353
1 year ago

Hello!

An adverb does not always have to belong to an adverbial determination, this is the case here.

Here it is an attribute to the Nomen “House”, as you have already mentioned, which now assumes the role of a subject:

What has just been rebuilt? The house there. It’s just part of it. Of course, “where?” can be asked, but the “where?” belongs to the subject, to the house, and in the sentence is not an adverbial destiny (as a single member with his function), but belongs to that.

Greetings from Maxime! 🍄

Koschutnig
1 year ago

The adverb “dort” gets information and now knows more about the subject.

MaxMusterman353
1 year ago
Reply to  Koschutnig

If “dort” were somewhere else, you would be right, but since it is connected to the Nomen “House” (Attribute) and as a subject, it is not an adverbial destiny.

DerKalif
1 year ago

To distinguish it might help if you realize that adverbial regulations are always their own set-ups. In your example, there only part of a member. Adverbs can also be set-ups (for themselves alone). An example:

  • The house there is green. there attriubated house and is part of the member The house there [Subject]
  • I’m leaving there like a walk. there here is an adverbial destination of the place
Katharina894
1 year ago

It’s an attribute to a nom.

the house there – what house?

After an adverbial destiny, you ask “where?”, not “what kind of one?”.

Katharina894
1 year ago
Reply to  Michistat

You have to make whole sentences.

the house… where? These are not all sentences.

Katharina894
1 year ago
Reply to  Michistat

The house is there – where is the house? There!

The house was just rebuilt – what kind of house was just rebuilt? The house there!