Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Uneternal
Uneternal
2 years ago

Gives various adapters that all differ in price and sometimes work less well with specific lenses, and react very sluggishly on the A7II with certain lenses or completely refuse to work in bad lighting conditions. It would be worth mentioning:

Sigma MC-11: Convenient and works almost perfectly with Sigma lenses. With Canon but rather grow through.
Viltrox EF-E5: Convenient, cool LCD display but high performance.
Metabones Mark V: The most expensive adapter, but works better with Canon lenses than the Sigma.

Generally adapting is rather an emergency solution, perfect adaptation only works on Canon Bodies, e.g. EOS RP.

1
DIYFotoFamilie
Author
DIYFotoFamilie
2 years ago
Reply to  Uneternal

It’s a tough decision. Then I’ll buy a lens. Can you recommend, I’m an absolute amateur, but I’m 30 years old. I preferred to have photographed with an objective 18-200. I photograph 90% of the landscape and what happens in everyday life. Hardly in churches or when dark. Thank you.

0
gary0733
gary0733
2 years ago
Reply to  DIYFotoFamilie

If you are looking for a lens with such a large focal length range, I can recommend the 28-200 from Tamron. In the low focal length range it has a 2.8 aperture. And the quality is also really good if you don’t want to sell pictures to high-gloss magazines, I would look at some reviews on YouTube. A while ago, I bought the Sony Zeiss 16-35 f4. This really makes bomb photos and is needed for around 500,- not too expensive.

1
Uneternal
Uneternal
2 years ago
Reply to  DIYFotoFamilie

Such an immerdrauf superzoom is not really sensible on a full format. Generally, the further the zoom of min-max, the worse the image quality. I would recommend a moderate zoom like the Sony 24-105mm f/4 G, the Samyang 24-70mm f/2.8 or the Sony 24-70 f/4 ZA OSS. The latter one gets used on Ebay classifieds already under 400€ and it is a prestigious look of Zeiss. The zoom area should be thick for landscape.

1
gary0733
gary0733
2 years ago

I have made the Sigma MC-11 and with it good experiences. But at the time, no control recordings with my Canon made whether the autofocus on the Sony is slower by the adapter. They definitely work and are not noticeably slow now. Otherwise everything else works automatically.
In the case of the adapters, the different brands cut differently well. As a rule, the MC-11 is best rated.
I’ve already separated myself from two Canon lenses. Adapter annoyed when changing the lens. In the long term, the last soft and replaced with FE.
For a transitional period, I would buy him again. But for the time, it’s nothing for me.
The selection of FE lenses has also become really good.

1