Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
14 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
SamaMoldo
1 year ago

Small, but not too small – not too small for me.

On average, a mammothic size is and has nothing to do with personal feeling.

LeFreak72
1 year ago

If you refer to the younger (adult) men (in Germany):

181-182 is the average size. This is a very useful 1st landmark. Those who are so large or are only slightly below this size can hardly be referred to as small.

75% of men will be at least 177. So, about every 4th man gets that big. So here you could start talking about “more smaller” men. 177 is already latent in the area, which is usually recognized as smaller than 181 in everyday life.

90% of men will be at least 174. There are already 7 centimeters to the average. This is almost always clearly recognizable in everyday life smaller than an average man.

97% of men will be at least 169. At the latest, there must be special circumstances that a man of this size is not perceived as much smaller than an average man.

So it’s obvious that somewhere between the two last named values of small men you have to talk. Otherwise, you could say smoothly, there are no small men (except for a few exceptions from a few small breeders, which approx. 0.1-0.2% and below 150.

Unconditionally added again: The “small” feature is a classification into the total mass of (younger) men. And then it is only the question of how much percent of those with the smallest size could be called small. Or more crimped: Someone is small and anyone is even the smallest.

Furthermore, it must be added that there are significantly more smaller men over all age groups of men (previously the numbers refer to the youngest generations of adult men only). Of all adult men, almost every eighth is under 170. This classification in the category “Small” is of course not easier.

Or an attempt to look at it: 177-186 means in younger men that they are neither the largest quarter nor the smallest quarter. So represent a fairly broad average that is “50% in the middle”. Those who no longer make it in there tend to be classified as small. Over all (growing) age groups, this type of classification shifts somewhat downwards to about 172-183.

Personally, I think that starting at the latest 170 or below, one must actually talk about “small” men. If you move it even further down, a division will not make any sense.

WitchesAndCats
1 year ago

Under 1,60m.

My ex is 1.65m and I found it quite normal.

SilentGirl186
1 year ago
Reply to  WitchesAndCats

How big are you

WitchesAndCats
1 year ago
Reply to  SilentGirl186

1,60m

Uwe65527
1 year ago

I am 1.85m. 10 cm less seem small to me.

ThexSun
1 year ago

All under 1.70. In addition, it’s not small for me.

Lg ThexSun

trans64
1 year ago

All under 180.

Men under 180, for example, would not be data. Exceptions: For example, for money or power.

Then I’d rather sit in the golden cage.

GerryV1990
1 year ago
Reply to  trans64

Men under 180, for example, would not be data. Exceptions: For example, for money or power.

Disgusting attitude.

Glandorf
1 year ago

I just like men over 195 🤓

ThexSun
1 year ago
Reply to  Glandorf

Ha gayyyyyyy

SilentGirl186
1 year ago

All under 170

Dachssi
1 year ago

so ca

Curasanus
1 year ago

Under 160 cm.