Hello
I wanted to ask when a camera is old, from which year for example, I wanted to get a camera that is from 2018 and it is now 2023, is this camera too old?
Kind regards
(1 votes)
Loading...With a camera, when it's not night and you're not indoors?
Is it normal to breathe faster when you're drunk?
Hello! As you probably read above, I want to take my SLR camera (Nikon d330) with me to Asia! I definitely want to take them with me in my hand luggage. My question is whether that's allowed and whether anyone has any experience with it. 🙂 Best regards
Hey I spoke to someone on WhatsApp yesterday and so on. How can I see or where do I have to press to see how long I was on the phone and from when to when, because that's possible on Android too. thanks in advance
We bought two new iPhone 15 Pros, but one is darker than the other. All settings are identical on both phones. Why is this happening, and what can we do? We had the same problem with our 13 Pros before. We transferred our phones, so I assume it's something with the settings, but I don't…
With cameras, it’s about like game consoles. How long has the PS5 been there and is it still up to date? Even people with a PS4 of 2013 are still supplying games.
With cameras it is similar, successor models generally only exist after ~4 years and the innovations are very low. This means that even 8-10-year-old cameras still provide more or less the same image quality than today’s devices.
What changes noticeably in cameras are comfort functions such as autofocus tracking. The rest are almost insignificant pixel elevations. The jump from 20 to 24 megapixels is just a difference of ~530 pixels more in width. And the sensor dynamics have improved minimally, which is of no concern to a newbie.
You should avoid the M50 from https://www.photografix-magazin.de/canon-eos-m-further-cameras-set/
If it is to be Canon, you should think about an older 77D or 80D (so one I have) or get into the R system.
Anyway, look for a system where you can use the lenses later. With Canon you can use all lenses with the EF or EF-S Mount to the R, but you need an adapter. The EF-M does not seem to work.
It doesn’t mean that the camera suddenly no longer works. You will get used Objekive as a bargain for the next 10 years and EF and EF-S can also be adapted.
Too old for what?
under an old camera I understand one that is at least 20 years old.
otherwise it depends on what you want to photograph and output
Hello,
Would like to take photos of nature like the Alps.
I thought of such a Canon EOS m50 with an EF-M 18-150mm objective.
Is that good?
And the camera has 24.1 megapixels is good?
Has a 4k video function but would make more pictures than videos
Apart from the fact that megapixels say nothing about quality – 24 are absolutely sufficient if you don’t plan posters in wall size.
The DSLM (without mirror) belongs to the future, because the mirrors are no longer developed.
DSLM also typically have a stabilization of the sensor itself and an intelligent autofocus that can identify objects to us. There’s no DSLR.
The M50 is not a reflection camera (DSLR), but a mirrorless (DSLM).
In front of the sensor, mirror reflex cameras have a folding mirror that redirects the image to the optical seeker. When you take a photo, this is briefly folded away and the light falls on the image sensor.
In the case of mirrorless cameras, the mirror is not present, so the light falls continuously onto the sensor. The viewfinder is here a mini display which indicates the image of the sensor.
The advantage of mirror reflex cameras is that the viewfinder image is just optical, so there is no digital sensor or screen in the game. But they are often much heavier and bigger. The searchers in mirrorless cameras are still good, and there is the advantage that you can see the picture exactly as it is recorded.
Qualitatively, it doesn’t make any difference. In both variants, the light falls exactly on the sensor without what is in between.
Well, I had to buy a used camera anyway. You can compare it with the bike and you can not buy a 10,000€ bike.
Will you buy me the Canon EOS m50, one question would I still have it is a reflection camera right? And what is the difference between mirror reflex camera and a mirror reflex camera? Does it make a difference whether the result is bad or good? Better formulated what of the two is more recommended
Lg
I would suggest you buy it (also needed, as you save a lot of money) and try to get it right. In the end, the photographer is always strong. But the image quality is great, you don’t have to worry.
Above all, natural photography is a simple area for cameras, as there are no extreme requirements such as sports or wildlife photography.
Thank you.
So you’d say that the Canon EOS m50 is good/recommendable, right?
In the area of nature/alpen recordings.
2018 is brand new. “Alt” would be vlt at DSLRs. 15-20 years, many cameras around 2008 can still be used easily. At spiI’d say nothing more than 10 years.
“alt” is a more silently understood camera and theoretically applies to anyone who has left the loading table.
It is only crucial if it is technically perfect and in the frame of this technology makes good photos in the hand of a good photographer according to its requirements.
a functioning leica from the 30s also makes presentable images today, but a glammed and reefed DSLR which is 2 years old would be ripe for the electrocuted.
No. It has not changed much, except an unused pixel hype.